Entry Point Engagement

CTO Sprint

A structured, high-intensity 4–6 week executive engagement to identify what’s broken, align leadership, and establish a clear path forward — fast.

Most organizations at an inflection point don’t have a visibility problem — they have a structural one. The Sprint is designed to expose it clearly and give leadership the tools to act on it.

The situation this is built for

This is not for early-stage experimentation.

This is for organizations where something is already going wrong.

Implementation Risk

Your ERP or WMS go-live is behind schedule, over budget, or producing the wrong outcomes. Vendors are pointing at scope, operations is pointing at configuration, and no one owns the decision that would fix it.

Decision Ambiguity

Technology decisions are being made inconsistently, or not at all. Different stakeholders have different answers to "who decides?" And the escalation path when something goes wrong is unclear or nonexistent.

Architectural Drift

Systems have evolved without intentional design. Integrations are brittle. Technical debt has accumulated past the point where anyone has a clear picture of exposure.

Governance Gaps

Governance was designed for a project, not for an organization. There's no ongoing decision framework, no executive-level visibility into technology risk, and no structure to prevent the same failure from recurring.

What happens during a Sprint

Five focused workstreams with your executive team — CEO, COO, IT leadership, and operations stakeholders — over 4–6 weeks.

01

Technology Landscape Assessment

A full inventory of your current systems, architecture, and integrations. What exists, how it connects, where the fragility is, and what it would take to change.

02

Governance & Decision Structure Evaluation

How are technology decisions currently made? Who owns them? What happens when they conflict across departments? We map how decisions actually get made — not how the org chart says they should.

03

Risk & Gap Identification

Where are the decisions that haven't been made? What risks are accumulating because no one owns them? What's about to break before anyone's ready for it?

04

Roadmap Integrity Analysis

Is your current technology roadmap executable as written? Does it conflict with your operational reality? Is it sequenced correctly? We score it honestly.

05

Stakeholder Alignment Sessions

Structured conversations with CEO, COO, IT, and operations leadership to surface misalignment, identify conflicting assumptions, and create shared clarity.

Deliverables

What you leave with


By the end of the Sprint, leadership has a clear understanding of what’s wrong, what matters, and what to do next.

Five concrete outputs that leadership can act on immediately — not a consulting report that sits on a shelf.

Risk & Gap Register

A clear inventory of ownership gaps and structural risks driving current and future exposure.

Governance Maturity Assessment

A scored evaluation of how your organization currently makes, owns, and escalates technology decisions — and where the gaps are.

Roadmap Integrity Score

An honest assessment of whether your current technology roadmap is executable as written, where it conflicts with operational reality, and what needs to change.

Executive Decision Framework

A repeatable structure for making technology decisions at the executive level — with clear ownership, escalation paths, and evaluation criteria.

90-Day Action Plan

Prioritized, sequenced next steps with clear ownership — so leadership walks away with a plan that can be executed immediately.

Outcomes

What changes after a Sprint

The shift leadership experiences immediately after the Sprint.

Leadership Alignment

Leadership is aligned on what actually matters — not operating from competing assumptions.

Decision Ownership

Clear ownership of decisions, risks, and execution — no more ambiguity or escalation confusion.

Execution Clarity

A realistic, executable path forward — not a theoretical or disconnected roadmap.

Risk Visibility

A clear understanding of where risk exists, what’s driving it, and what needs immediate attention.

Is a CTO Sprint the right move?

The Sprint is designed for organizations where something is off — or about to break — but the root cause isn’t clear. If any of the following are true, we should talk.

  • Distribution, logistics, supply chain, or 3PL operators
  • Companies with $20M–$500M+ in revenue under technology strain
  • Leadership teams mid-way through a failing or stalled implementation
  • Organizations preparing for a transaction that requires technology diligence
  • Executives who suspect the problem is structural but can't name it precisely


If you're looking for incremental optimization or a second opinion, this is not the right fit.

Start with a focused diagnostic conversation.

A 30–45 minute working session to assess what’s happening, where the risk is, and whether a Sprint is the right intervention. No pitch. No deck. Just clarity.

Schedule a Diagnostic Conversation

You can also read about ongoing advisory →